Person Holding Hand In His Arms

What is the Meaning of Quid Pro Quo Harassment?

         Sexual Harassment

The term quid pro quo is a Latin phrase that translates to “something for something” or “what for what.” In workplace environments, it is often linked to sexual harassment claims. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act identifies two main types of harassment: quid pro quo and hostile work environment.

In quid pro quo cases, the harassment refers to a superior demanding sexual favors from an employee in exchange for some work-related benefit, such as a promotion, increase in pay, or preferable work shifts. Alternatively, the superior might threaten negative outcomes like demotion, salary cuts, or unfavorable reviews if the demands are not met.

This can be through direct requests or more implied expectations, but regardless of how it is presented, it is against the law. In California, if the person committing the harassment is in a supervisory position or higher up than the victim within the company, the employer is held directly responsible.

Understanding the Meaning of Quid Pro Quo Harassment

Quid pro quo harassment occurs under specific circumstances within the workplace where a power imbalance exists. This is where a supervisor or any employee with decision-making power leverages their position over a subordinate or a colleague. 

This type of harassment is exemplified by instances where a manager/owner demands sexual favors in exchange for workplace benefits, creating a significant power imbalance that makes it difficult for the subordinate to refuse without fearing repercussions.

Conversely, if two coworkers at the same level without any significant power disparity engage in similar behavior, it is generally classified as sexual harassment rather than quid pro quo harassment. This distinction is important because, without a power imbalance, the dynamic and implications of the harassment are vastly different.

In cases of quid pro quo harassment, an executive might use their authority to promise something in return for sexual favors that could affect the career trajectory of an employee. This could be:

  • Promotions or advancement opportunities
  • Salary increases
  • Positive performance evaluations
  • Job security (assurance against firing or demotion)
  • Favorable outcomes in job-related evaluations and interviews
  • Guarantee of regular salary without unjust deductions

It should be noted that quid pro quo harassment does not require physical contact; any proposition for an intimate act, such as a kiss, hug, or an invitation for a date, can qualify. The mere offer itself, regardless of being acted upon, constitutes harassment and is both unethical and illegal.

How Can Employees Prove Quid Pro Quo Harassment?

To establish your claim as per the quid pro quo sexual harassment definition, your workplace harassment attorney in California will demonstrate certain legal elements that underline the abuse of power in the workplace. These include:

Protected status

You (the plaintiff/employee) must first establish that you are protected under federal law. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, all employees are safeguarded against discrimination based on sex, which includes protection from sexual harassment.

Source of harassment

You will have to provide evidence that you received unwelcome sexual advances from a supervisor or someone who holds a position of authority over you within the organization.

Sexual motivation

It must be clear that the actions of the harasser were sexually motivated, i.e., you must prove that the conduct was not just personal or based on other non-sexual reasons.

Impact on employment

You must show that your response to the conduct had a tangible impact on your employment. This could have been in the form of change in your job duties, salary adjustments, changes in job status like promotions or demotions, or termination of the job altogether.

Employer liability

Under the legal principle of respondeat superior, the employer can be held responsible if the harassment was carried out by someone in a supervisory role or if the harasser had the power to affect the terms and conditions of your job.

Both current employees and job applicants can be victims of quid pro quo harassment. For instance, a job applicant might be promised employment on the condition that they acquiesce to exploitative conduct from a hiring manager. This too falls under quid pro quo harassment and is actionable under the same legal protections.

Types of Evidence to Prove Quid Pro Quo Harassment

In proving quid pro quo harassment, your California workplace harassment attorney will gather various types of evidence. It could include documented communications such as emails, texts, or written correspondence that explicitly outline demands or exchanges of favors for employment benefits. Witness testimonies from colleagues or individuals who have observed the harassment can provide valuable firsthand accounts. 

Additionally, any records of changes in job status, promotions, or demotions coinciding with the harassment allegations can serve as compelling evidence. Your attorney may also seek out documentation of complaints made to HR or management, along with any subsequent actions taken or lack thereof.

Are Threats Alone Sufficient to Prove Quid Pro Quo Harassment?

When trying to prove quid pro quo harassment in California, a worker must demonstrate how responding to a superior’s misconduct negatively impacted their job. In the situation where a manager threatens to demote or fire an employee if they do not comply with sexual advances – what if the former never acts on these threats after the employee refuses?

In most cases, this alone does not establish a quid pro quo claim because there has to be an actual negative consequence on the employee’s job, like a demotion or termination.

Simply put, if a supervisor’s threats are not carried out, it generally does not meet the criteria for quid pro quo harassment. However, this does not mean the behavior is acceptable. Such threats could still contribute to a claim of creating a hostile work environment, which is another form of workplace harassment. The company may still be accountable, even if the threats are not executed.

Person Holding His Hand Up With A Black Background

Our Seasoned Employment Law Attorneys will Fight to Maximize Your Compensation 

Whether you agreed to or rejected any improper requests, it is important to remember that none of this is your fault. A safe workplace is your legal right. If someone at work has made inappropriate demands that go beyond your job duties, it is within your rights to report this behavior to HR or the authorities. If your employer fails to properly address the issue, or if they retaliate against you, you might need to take legal steps.At Rubin Law Corporation, we can guide you through the process by explaining quid pro quo harassment in the workplace and ensuring you receive the largest compensation you are entitled to from all the defendants. Since 1995, we have challenged hundreds of employers across California who misused their power and position and obtained large settlements and verdicts for the victims. If you are looking for a trusted and proven employment lawyer, reach us online or call us at (213) 996-0196 to book a free case evaluation.